| Latest Forum Topics / Acma Last:0.053 -- |
 Post Reply
|
|
TA on ZaoBao
|
|
|
maximuslee
Member |
01-Oct-2007 13:33
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Something is boiling? why so high volumes out of sudden? |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
smartrader
Elite |
24-Sep-2007 21:09
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Bullish sign for this counter.. trying to breakout of 12 cents.. anyone has information on this counter ? |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
importexport
Member |
17-Sep-2007 00:13
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This is a GEM .... more upside can be expected |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
Manikamaniko.
Master |
14-Aug-2007 18:45
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Acma "cheonged"! A name change is in the pipeline.. may hit the 0.14 resistance line before backing down. 
|
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
EastonBay
Master |
25-Jun-2007 23:50
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
unbelievable! For as long as I can remember, it has been Acma.... why would they want to change name to have the word 'China' infront. Fashionable or what? To confirm that it's has been Acma, got the info from SGX website: The Company was incorporated on 9 October 1965 (just 2 months after Singapore was born!) as a private company. It acquired public status on 5 June 1968. .... The Company's name was changed from Acma Electrical Industries Ltd to Acma Ltd on 1 August 1990. (note that the word Acma remained) unbelievable... do they think by changing the name will bring good fortune to the share price? |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
zhuge_liang
Supreme |
25-Jun-2007 20:12
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It has proposed to change its name to China Auto Corporation. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
zhuge_liang
Supreme |
29-May-2007 12:42
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Rose on a proposed disposal of its Australian unit (National Engineering Pty Ltd). Some traders speculated that this could pave the way for some new business injection in the future. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
ivorycoast
Elite |
15-May-2007 10:43
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Glad to hear that someone mentioned that it sounds like another EasyCall ..... And wow ..... the 80 cents dream ...... |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
ivorycoast
Elite |
15-May-2007 10:39
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
How about this one? Anyone taking risk to short? |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
mpeg444
Member |
14-May-2007 13:17
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
ACMA by shareinvestor Forum Hi Xfactor and all In my opinion, the potential of a transformed Acma has not been discovered yet due to the lack of reporting & publicity in the newspapers about the debt-equity swap, the placement shares, the put-call options, and the involvement of Doris Chung & her spouse. Caveat Emptor Sound Like Easy Call in early Days...From 15 Cents to 80Cents Originally Posted by Mccool Commentary: 1. The deal with Doris Chung could be transformational 2. Look at the resources Doris is committing in buying Acma (a) The immediate & direct stake (4.4% of 879,043,000 shares = 38.7m shares acquired at undisclosed price (b) 50m shares through placement agreement @ 0.08 = $4m (c) The call & put options (which is as good as a Sale & Purchase Agreement - both sides can't back out of it) to be exercised over the course of the next few years. (4 tranches) = (381,816,250 X 0.05) + (381,816,250 X 0.05) + (381,816,250 X 0.07) + (381,816,250 X 0.15) = 1,527,265,000 X 0.08 (average prc) = $122.2m 3. The revitalised Acma balance sheet after the debt-equity swap. (a) Gearing drops from 175.7 times to 0.21 times (b) Shareholders' funds increased from $757K to $126.9m (c) NAV increases from 0.1 cts to 5.2 cts per share 4. No overhang of shares due to (a) Moratorium on Conversion Shares (b) Banks' exit strategy is via Doris Chung, not on the open market. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
lamalama
Member |
08-May-2007 15:21
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
trading for this counter halted today?? anyone know something to share?? tks! |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
derekchong
Veteran |
07-May-2007 10:18
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
ha ha ha this penny stock is not too bad after all. restructuring or not, never mind .just keep moving up. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
hamdyy
Member |
28-Apr-2007 09:50
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
heard from some forum person that they are undergoing restructuring |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
derekchong
Veteran |
20-Apr-2007 15:03
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
this laggard start to move now with high volumn.anyone know the reason. pl share. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
EastonBay
Master |
22-Mar-2007 17:36
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
this kind of penny stock is not for me, very small retail investor, more like the a-pek kind of stock. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
derekchong
Veteran |
22-Mar-2007 15:25
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
STI up 60 pts, this counter move south.How to buy low and sell high.Not easy for penny stock at this volatile market.Trade with care. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
taybc1071
Senior |
31-Dec-2006 17:04
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi iPunter, what rogue_trader mentioned is right, we are here to share and learn, more importantly to make profits. For me, I'm new here trying to learn from the all the gurus here including you. You also mentioned friction and disagreement exist, so just take it easy and imagine that you are in a debate. Wishing you a happy and prosperous new year! |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
rogue_trader
Master |
31-Dec-2006 16:09
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
iPunter, no go la. I think there no two sides of a good point in a human. If only matter which perspective one is looking from. Sometimes I really wonder if those so-called arguments are "staged" by "competitors of ShareJunction, and also including the "bad points" saga few months ago, so that people will be discourage to use this forum. I strongly believe that arguments can weaken a bond, but it can also strengthen a bond if one thinkings is firm. Like if all the "speculators" in Singapore combine together and "aim" at one particular counter, I think it can thwart those big-boys manipulations. I love some of your langauage used in your posts and your knowledge. If you want to keep all this to yourself by leaving this forum, I think SJ will going to be a dull place with no talented people to booast about. Last but not least, pls look at the bigger picture. We are all here to share and learn, and hopefully profits coming in. Some of us here are only small players, surely you wouldn't want us to be "played" out by those big players rite? Wish you all the best. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
giantlow
Master |
31-Dec-2006 12:39
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
yup. yup if we all agree with each other. dun think we would learn much eh. we would be simply stroking each other egos rite? |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
prettylisa
Member |
31-Dec-2006 12:09
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi iPunter, I don't contribute much in this forum because I'm not a good investor. Just trying to learn from the gurus here. I read your posts a lot so please don't go away! :) Have a Happy New Year! ~lisa |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |