Latest Forum Topics / Olam Intl | Post Reply |
OLAM_OLAM
|
|||||
Isolator
Supreme |
31-Dec-2012 11:11
Yells: "STI is hard landing to below 2000..." |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
come come below $1.2.... | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Kensonic77
Veteran |
31-Dec-2012 11:02
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
  Not comfirmed yet: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/globalbusiness/8024112/Louis-Dreyfus-in-talks-with-Olam-to-create-global-commodities-giant.html |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
stkoh78
Member |
31-Dec-2012 10:43
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
U need to liaise with remiser. I have no issue with my remiser who will make arrange with their finance dept. 
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
SgxTrader
Member |
31-Dec-2012 09:51
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Just a short question.. I sold my first share last friday, can I buy the share today so that both the trades settle on Friday? (Since tomorrow is public holiday)..  | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Obfuscate
Senior |
31-Dec-2012 09:15
|
||||
x 1
x 1 Alert Admin |
Thx counter. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
counter
Senior |
31-Dec-2012 07:59
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
There was a news article  on September 25 2010 in The Straits Times  on the merger talk between Olam International and the French giant Louis Dreyfus, by Gabriel Chen. In the article, Jim Rogers was said to be an Olam shareholder.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
counter
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 20:32
|
||||
x 0
x 2 Alert Admin |
Read the post carefully. From sep 2008 to dec 2009, his wealth more than doubled due to his profit in the stock market. So is he a person without foresight in your view? |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wanglausern
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 20:30
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Am talking about 2009 and not 2008! Don't turn and twist for only snakes do!
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
counter
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 20:26
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Simply because you don't rent your residence, you don't agree with people who do. What type of mindset is that? It seems to me you define  a person with foresight as one who  has made money in every single area. This type of person does not exist. Jim Rogers is a commodity guru, not a property expert. I know of a person who put off the purchase of a property in 2009 and hence by your calculation, he did not reap the benefit of 60% to 80% of property appreciation. However, the reason he put off the purchase was so that he had more funds to invest  in the stock market. From sep 2008 to dec 2009, his wealth more than doubled due to his profit in the stock market. So is he a person without foresight in your view? |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wanglausern
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 18:49
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If he's that successful and has got good foresight, he should have bought his bungalow in 2009 and by now its value has appreciated by 60% to 80%.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wanglausern
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 18:42
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
How do you know if Temasek didn't incentivise  J R to endorse Olam? Anyway what is the big deal about his small position in Olam? If he exercised his 5m to 10m position for the rights issue then it's significant to me. I am no billionaire, but I don't rent my residence.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Rosesyrup
Veteran |
30-Dec-2012 18:38
Yells: "Get your own opinion, don't follow blindly." |
||||
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
Regarding your statement " Sunny quoted " We will take stock and see whether we need to slow down, decelerate, recalibrate. We're convinced that we've got a great strategy . . . but we might recalibrate . . . the pace at which we are doing things," . Sunny merely felt that the company's acquistion plan might be too agressive and too rapid, thus leading to investors' doubt and uncomfortableness. Sunny did not say anything about the firm has difficulty in its debt repayment. If you think that investors' uncomfortableness is a fundamental problem, I have got to fully agree with you. Although it is true that some investors are concered with its high debt, there are still a large number of investors who are willing to buy into Olam. This can be easily seen from Olam current share price- Olam's market value is merely 8% less than what it was piror to MW's attack. Thus such fundamental " problem" is not a major concern for me and it appear to me that the most of the shareholders remain comfortable with this firm. As for the " much anticpated second report from Olam" , I am not sure who is anticpating such a report. You or the market? MW's 133 pages report has already been retorted by Olam's 45 pages report. After its 133 pages report, MW has yet to make any new claim- " new" is the key word here. What is there for Olam to response to? Maybe you would like to quote us some articles on market expecting Olam's second report. As for your demand for a perfect company without any weakness, perhaps Olam with its high debt is reallynot an investment option for you and you should seek for other counters. If you are kind enough, you might like to share with us who are the perfect companies before you leave for other topics on this forum. Remember to quote us the reasons and your definition of a " perfect firm" too- maybe a firms which are monopoly and have 100% of its assets in cash are perfect firms? Thanks in advance.   You have also raised the concern that many of the forum users, who posted supportive comments about Olam, are actually multiple accounts owned by the same person. However, this is something that you can't verify or prove. So what happened to your call for a " more balance,truthful and enriching discussion in a respectful manner" , when you keep harping on something you can't prove? Why not be more respectful, and give everyone on this forum the benefit of doubt. Afterall when it comes to discussion, it's the content of the comments that matter, not the person behind it- be objective!!!! Before I end my comment here, I would like to reiterate the great opportunity I see in the agriculture business in the coming years. Comparative advantage (CA) of farming lies with developing countries due to its cheaper labor, land and other legal aspect. However, for decades developed countries (mostly from Europe) have distorted such CA, by providing their farmers with generous subsidies- for political reason.Such large subsidies lead to great competition for firms in developing countries who giving out lesser subsidies. As a result, agriculture firms in developing countries recieved much thinner margin and are forced to operate in a much more efficient manner in order to survive. Nevertheless, the situation is changing, the recent European financial crisis have forced many of its government to reform: cut subsidies to farmers and move to export goods that they have CA in. One of the most recent example is Dairy farmers from France, Germany, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands went on a strike aganist the low purchase price set by their governemts. Refer to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/9705438/EU-dairy-farmers-spray-Brussels-parliament-with-milk.html   With the European nations moving away from subsidising agri businesses, we can expect farmers in these nations to shift toward other industries that their countires have CA in. This would in turn reduce the competition for agri firms operating in the developing countries, and their margin would also improve. Most of Olam operations are in developing countries. Olam with its newly acquired business units would provide it with the economies of scales it needed to compete in the agriculture industry when the world economy recover. Just as the lemon are pretty good, grapes are pretty sour too.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
counter
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 14:48
|
||||
x 0
x 2 Alert Admin |
The discussion started with me pointing out that you contradicted yourself of the objective of the bonds rights issue but ended up with you accusing me of opening many accounts to drum up support. You call this a fruitful discussion. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
counter
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 14:32
|
||||
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
You can't get a fruitful discussion by making baseless accusations and by jumping from topic to topic.  
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
gavinl
Elite |
30-Dec-2012 14:13
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Lol. Here we go again.. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Octavia
Elite |
30-Dec-2012 13:56
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
There is no time frame required  of me to answer to any queries or share my views. I am not here  to impress with fast replies,announce my holdings,soliciting bewilder answers and canvassing Q & A. Unlike someone here earlier who has mutiple accounts using them to drum up support for own ulterior motives.I am so glad that all those fricitious accounts have been flushed out for good.Only a loser would go to such extend. I look forward to more balance,truthful and enriching  discussion in  a respectful manner benefitting all at large irregardless whether you are a short seller,trader or investor.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Obfuscate
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 13:49
|
||||
x 1
x 1 Alert Admin |
Can share the source/ link your info pls?
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
counter
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 13:38
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
You would be naive to expect someone who has a long position in a stock to talk down the company like  you. You would be  even  more naive to expect someone who has a long position in a stock to have a negative view of the company like yours. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Octavia
Elite |
30-Dec-2012 13:27
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
So your fundamental judgement is not so fundamental afterall or bcos of your stock position in this counter make you  imperative to sugar coat all bad reviews.Hmm...
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
counter
Senior |
30-Dec-2012 13:07
|
||||
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
Another aspect of my self denial on your part? When  was the last time I said that Olam a perfect company? On 28/12/2012, 16.55, I wrote I see the weaknesses in Olam, but I see the strengths too.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |