Latest Forum Topics / Baker Technology Last:0.615 -- | Post Reply |
It's time to rebound ????
|
|||||
DnApeh
Master |
29-Apr-2010 21:41
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Thank you very much.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
purelotus
Senior |
29-Apr-2010 21:31
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Board of Directors of Baker Technology Limited (the “Company”) refers to the announcements dated 17 April 2010 and 23 April 2010 (the “Earlier Announcements”) in relation to the Proposed Disposal. Capitalised terms used in this announcement shall have the same meanings as defined in the Earlier Announcements unless the context requires otherwise. The Company has today received, inter alia, further letters from SCM and their lawyers continuing with their assertions that the Proposed Disposal triggers the pre-emption rights of SCM as set out in, inter alia, PPL Shipyard’s Articles of Association and have purportedly exercised such rights. The Board wishes to reiterate that it has sought and received legal advice that SCM has no basis for its claims. The Company will keep Shareholders apprised of any material developments, where appropriate. By Order of the Board Baker Technology Limited Aw Seok Chin Company Secretary 29 April 2010
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
DnApeh
Master |
29-Apr-2010 21:08
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
There is a new announcement on SGX about a 2nd letter from SCM, but i can't open it. Can someone please help? Thanks. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
29-Apr-2010 20:39
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
WHY they exit ? YANGZIJIANG BUY AGREEMENT IS BINDING FUTURE is STiLL iNTACT
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
29-Apr-2010 18:45
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It is gOOd tO jOin iN the ROCK & ROLL DANCES One day Up Next day dOwn One day dOwn Next day Up mOrning Up afternOOn dOwn mOrning dOwn afternOOn Up And makE sOme mOney |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
buysell
Member |
29-Apr-2010 18:13
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It's those that play contra and can't pay up exiting these few days. Push the price lower and let me accumulate. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
29-Apr-2010 17:45
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
i sOld this mOrning and bOught back befOre clOsing +S$0.015 CONTRA STATEMENT cOming VERY NiCE iNDEED PRACTICE SOMETHING NEW SELL HiGH bUy lOw |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
29-Apr-2010 17:40
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Thursday: 29 APRIL 2010 CLOSING S$0.530 -S$0.015 DOW PHOBIA |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
iPunter
Supreme |
29-Apr-2010 14:27
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Many have bought condominiums with their winnings in this stock couple weeks ago... |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
29-Apr-2010 12:58
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Market Maker beHiND this stOck ? sEEms |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
29-Apr-2010 12:35
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
CALM befOre PERFECT STORM |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
SafeTrading
Member |
29-Apr-2010 12:24
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
quiet today | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
28-Apr-2010 18:10
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
S$0.545 -S$0.010 Wednesday: 28 APRIL 2010 CLOSING 2932.04 -59.64 STi CORRECTION GREECE CONTAGION |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
28-Apr-2010 10:05
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
NORMAL SITUATION wOuld have a WARRANT PREMIUM of say S$0.010 instead. That is, S$0.255 vs S$0.565 instead of S$0.205 vs S$0.565
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
28-Apr-2010 10:03
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
S$0.205 vs S$0.565 = S$0.245 ARBITRAGE PROFIT = S$0.040 As mOre Warrants are bought up and converted to shares, the arbitrage GAP wiLL be CLOSED. It is ABNORMAL to have such a GAP |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
buysell
Member |
28-Apr-2010 09:45
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
well done this morning Bakertech. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
28-Apr-2010 08:44
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I met a group of BAKER TECH warrant unit holders yesterday. They have obtained the CONFIRMATION REPLY from BAKER TECH IR as follows: * * * * * * * * Please see replies below in red.
There are some questions that I can’t answer as I do not have the complete set of information regarding your warrant holdings. Thus it would be good to ask Baker Tech’s warrant agent—Boardroom Corporate Advisory at 6536 5355; they will be able to offer further assistance.
Thanks.
Regards,
Junli
6236 6894
Begin forwarded message:
* * * * * * * *
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
27-Apr-2010 19:04
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Tuesday: 27 APRIL 2010 CLOSING S$0.555 +S$0.015 TODAY is prOfit TAKiNG DAY. STi 2991.680 -10.940 HSI -325 SSE -61 |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
buysell
Member |
27-Apr-2010 15:09
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Looks promising after these few days of movements,$0.63 at sight easily reached by next week. my 2 cents thoughts. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
elmoboy
Member |
26-Apr-2010 21:16
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
From Lim & Tan Baker accepted, on Apr 17th, the Letter of Offer from YZJ for PPL Holdings for US$155 mln (S$213 mln). Baker received on Apr 22nd a letter from Semb Marine demanding that Baker not accept YZJ’s offer, as it would circumvent the pre-emptive rights of Semb Marine in PPL Shipyard, by not giving Semb Marine the right of first refusal. (Semb Marine, in its announcement to the Exchange, said it is assessing its position, given its right of first refusal.) Baker added that it has sought and received legal advice that Semb Marine “has no basis for its claims”. PPL Shipyard, which is the sole asset of PPLH, is 85% owned by Semb Marine. For ye Dec ’09, the shipyard made a profit of US$254. 76 mln (about half of Semb Marine’s group profit), implying exit PE for Baker of 4.1x. PPL Shipyard’s NAV is US$343.55 mln, implying 3x book for the sale. The Sale & Purchase agreement between Baker and YZJ has to be completed by Oct 27th ’10. COMMENTS 1. Semb Marine could simply be delaying the completion of the deal between Baker and YZJ. 2. Even if Semb Marine were to exercise its right of first refusal, it would have to pay US$155 mln, which is well within its means, and which seems a fair price to pay based on PE, and despite being way above the price it paid for the 85% stake (e.g. the 50% stake had cost only $16 mln in Apr ‘01), the only “loser” would be YZJ. 3. And Baker would still receive US$155 mln, although investors counting on a generous payout may well be disappointed, based on the accompanying statement on “use of Proceeds (net estimated at S$208.59 mln): “for general working capital, future investments and or such other purposes as the directors may deem fit”, ie there was no mention of a distribution to reward shareholders. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |