Latest Forum Topics / StarHub Last:1.22 +0.01 | Post Reply |
Starhub
|
|||||
renzokun
Senior |
08-Apr-2010 10:04
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
seems like price jammed, may b reversing | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
investment
Senior |
07-Apr-2010 20:34
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
MediaCorp no longer shareholder of StarHub
With the distribution of the dividend in specie, which represents around 7.5 per cent of StarHub's issued share capital, the broadcaster is no longer a StarHub shareholder. Temasek Holdings has in turn sold the new StarHub shares to Aranda Investments, a wholly owned subsidiary of Temasek Capital unit Seletar Investments, at $2.29 apiece. STARHUB'S long-term shareholder MediaCorp has distributed its remaining 128 million shares in StarHub to Temasek Holdings as payment in lieu of a cash interim dividend for the financial year ended March 31, 2010. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
temp123
Senior |
05-Apr-2010 10:47
Yells: "." |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
http://sg.finance.yahoo.com/q/ta?s=CC3.SI&t=6m&l=off&z=l&q=l&p=&a=&c=Z74.SI
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Andrew
Master |
04-Apr-2010 23:30
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Price War coming. Actually, it has started alreadi. Have you been checking price plan recently ?
With garment proposing share content. Starhub stand to lose more. Singtel has deep pocket and a very hungry prediator.
See how far they go to win EPL ESPN. If you only knew the signifiance.
When there is a price war. Stand on the big guy side. I was there when Intel almost crushed AMD......heeeeee....
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
VestedInterest
Member |
04-Apr-2010 21:48
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Make money while you sleep. Buy Starhub because while you were sleeping, someone was surfing the net, talking on their handphone, watching cable TV, downloading a movie, playing online games, sending SMS'es, skyping, etc. etc. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
EQ_Trader
Member |
03-Apr-2010 16:48
Yells: "Trade with EQ not IQ! :)" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
this monday very likely will cross 2.40!
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
02-Apr-2010 20:48
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
mOre Upside ?
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
EQ_Trader
Member |
02-Apr-2010 02:24
Yells: "Trade with EQ not IQ! :)" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This MONDAY OPEN MARKET $$$$$$ |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
des_khor
Supreme |
01-Apr-2010 17:16
Yells: "Tell me who is the God or MFT from this forum??" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Highest of the year $2.38 !!! |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
EQ_Trader
Member |
01-Apr-2010 16:33
Yells: "Trade with EQ not IQ! :)" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
2.36 now! | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
sarsar
Senior |
01-Apr-2010 15:18
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I hear say there might be a correction before STI hits 2950...
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
EQ_Trader
Member |
01-Apr-2010 15:14
Yells: "Trade with EQ not IQ! :)" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Star should reach 2.40 by next week. with e help of the anouncement to pay out 2nd dividend this year of 5cts on around 10of june.2010. hooray! | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
temp123
Senior |
01-Apr-2010 14:38
Yells: "." |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This is just the beginning. Imagine STI 3k. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
des_khor
Supreme |
01-Apr-2010 11:21
Yells: "Tell me who is the God or MFT from this forum??" |
||||
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
$2.34 !!! |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
des_khor
Supreme |
01-Apr-2010 11:13
Yells: "Tell me who is the God or MFT from this forum??" |
||||
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
Sell Q so thin now.... good sign to mpve higher even faster ?? | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
des_khor
Supreme |
01-Apr-2010 11:03
Yells: "Tell me who is the God or MFT from this forum??" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
StarHub touch 52 weeks high !! WOW !! $2.32 !!! | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
des_khor
Supreme |
31-Mar-2010 16:41
Yells: "Tell me who is the God or MFT from this forum??" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Very well support at 2.30 !!! | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
humblepie
Member |
31-Mar-2010 08:00
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
here is more. ============== Harbinger Capital Partner’s bold plan to build out an open 4G wireless network has more moving parts than the latest OK Go video, and would require a minimum of $6 billion for the terrestrial and satellite infrastructure alone. Based on the expenses and the difficulty of building a cellular network, I’m skeptical that a competitive LTE network will come out of the plan. Many of our commenters have pointed out the incredible expense involved in building out a terrestrial network, although Harbinger does already have requests for proposals out seeking bids. (If you have one, send it along, please). But beyond the difficulty (and $5 billion cost) of building out a terrestrial network that would cover 100 million people by the end of 2012, Harbinger would have to also fund a satellite expansion that could cost as much as $1 billion to build, launch and operate through 2013. And on top of all that it would have to fend off AT&T and Verizon’s fury at the plan, launch devices with satellite and LTE chips and finally, sign up subscribers. In other words, cue the theme song for “Mission Impossible.” Harbinger is attempting to build out this network using a block of the airwaves owned by SkyTerra and other companies that have spectrum in what’s known as the MSS band. Companies that own this spectrum want to use their holdings to build a combo satellite and terrestrial network, made possible by a 2003 FCC order that was enacted in the hopes of enabling satellite firms to offer some competition for wireless broadband. It’s been a tough slog for those firms, and the FCC order issued Friday night allowing Harbinger to take complete control over SkyTerra and consolidate some of the MSS spectrum was the first significant breakthrough since the original 2003 order. While my initial reaction was that this was a mere financial play designed to help Harbinger package up a nice chunk of spectrum and flip it for hedge-fund like profits, there’s that RFP for a network buildout that Harbinger has circulated, and two sources have named Huawei as a potential source of equipment and possibly financing. Huawei has not returned repeated calls for comment. There’s also a source in the FCC who is adamant that Harbinger can’t flip the spectrum without triggering another review by the agency. Plus Harbinger has to meet stringent conditions related to the buildout, which means that if it wanted to flip the spectrum, it would still have to meet its first milestone of covering 100 million people by Dec. 31, 2012. I’m not completely sold on the flip-proof nature of the FCC conditions after seeing the FCC offer repeated waivers to satellite companies having troubles meeting deadlines or requirements imposed by the original ATC order from 2003. And Harbinger has a track record of betting on spectrum, such as with its investment in Sprint (it holds 75 million shares that it values at $274.5 million ) and its investments in other satellite companies. But even if we take Harbinger’s plan at face value, the private equity firm needs to raise about $6 billion to simply build out the network, with additional money dedicated to operating it. Maybe its execs can call Craig McCaw for advice. SkyTerra, meanwhile, would need to launch two satellites, and Harbinger has made multiple arrangements with TerreStar and Inmarsat to pay them for leasing their spectrum. Tim Farrar, a satellite analyst with TMF Associates, says those costs total about $1 billion —$336 million to pay Inmarsat and adjust its equipment for the new combined network, $115 million a year to Inmarsat to lease its spectrum and $24 million as a payment to TerreStar. Harbinger holds a 31 percent stake in TerreStar. These initial costs are daunting, but Harbinger has already invested at least $2 billion so far in TerreStar and SkyTerra, and is in a high-risk, high-reward business. But the risks are just as big as the costs. First, there’s the issue of finding a partner to build out the network. I, as well as Farrar, have fingered T-Mobile as the likeliest source because the FCC has forbidden AT&T and Verizon from gaining access to more than 25 percent of the MSS spectrum, and because Clearwire-Sprint has such large spectrum holdings. Although perhaps the Harbinger stake in Sprint could be an attempt to influence the cellular operator to provide access to its 3G network. And that lack of a 3G network could be a big deal. Harbinger says it plans to build out its LTE network pretty quickly (it has to in order to meet the FCC milestones), but until it does, subscribers to its service will only have terrestrial coverage in major markets. Elsewhere they would presumably have satellite coverage. And when it comes to satellite broadband speeds, they’re pretty weak. Plus you can’t use satellite service inside buildings. So unless Harbinger finds a 3G partner, phones or data access in areas where there’s no terrestrial LTE network will suck. Interestingly, TerreStar has a 3G partnership with AT&T, but I still doubt that model because the service is expensive, the device is clunky and the speeds are slow. However, that brings us to one of the final hurdles Harbinger will have to jump: the angry Bells. AT&T and Verizon both issued statements saying they found the FCC’s decision in this case troubling. I’m waiting to hear back from AT&T as to what TerreStar’s role in the Harbinger network might mean for its partnership with Ma Bell. TerreStar declined to comment, citing a confidentiality agreement it signed in January with the private equity firm. Clearly there’s a lot going on here, but building out a new nationwide network has never been easy. We’ll see if Harbinger’s plan for faster mobile broadband with a satellite backup is the real thing or merely another fat pipe dream. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
humblepie
Member |
31-Mar-2010 07:56
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Good morning everyone. Today i bring you an article talking about a hedge fund billionaire's attempt to start a 4G wireless service company to compete with verizon and at&t in the US. A good read on how new entrants need to compete with incumbants. =================================== Phil Falcone's hedge fund, Harbinger, is planning to build a 4G wireless network that will compete with major network providers like AT&T and Verizon. His plans are ambitious, to say the least. According to his business plan (embedded below, thanks to GigaOM) Falcone sees the launch happening before the third quarter of 2011, when a trial network set for Denver and Phoenix would cover 9 million. The next milestone is 100 million people to be covered by the end of 2012, 145 million by the end of 2013 and at least 260 million people in the United States by the end of 2015. (There's about 250 million wireless subscribers.) Harbinger will have to raise billions of dollars to see this project to fruition. They don't have anyone lined up yet. GigaOM estimates it will take Harbinger $6 billion. On the subject of fundraising, they received this message from a spokesman at Harbinger: Harbinger is in discussions with a
number of companies, which we cannot disclose, that provide a variety of
services and solutions, but have not finalized anything with any
potential partners.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Nova07
Member |
30-Mar-2010 16:06
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Would agree that the dividend yields of about 8.5-9.5% per year is quite solid based on 4x a year payout. I think parking money here for the dividends is better than parking in banks. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |