Latest Forum Topics / China Fishery Last:0.076 -- | Post Reply |
Time to wake up the Giant Fish
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
grandmaster89
Veteran |
19-Mar-2010 20:12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Golden Ocean dual-listed here this week and its trading volume here is really pathetic... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
marubozu1688
Veteran |
19-Mar-2010 20:04
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Double Tops Formation in sight! http://mystocksinvesting.com/singapore-stocks/china-fishery-double-tops-formation/ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
marubozu1688
Veteran |
19-Feb-2010 21:25
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
Elliot Wave of Wave C will send China Fishery stock price down.. http://mystocksinvesting.com/singapore-stocks/china-fishery/china-fishery-forming-a-wave-b/ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
investment
Senior |
19-Feb-2010 17:52
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
China Fishery gets nod to dual-list
It will offer up to 172m shares on Oslo bourse in bid to get better valuations
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
01-Feb-2010 14:28
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
GIANT FISH is CAUGHT & HUNG....in a PHOTO.... R....I....P.... |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
01-Feb-2010 13:18
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
lOOk at the Price Chart.... Potential downside back to its PRIOR DUAL LISTING EXCITATION at S$1.40.... The PERCEIVED EXITATION is OVER.... The REALITY is China Fishery Group's Price at STI is already TOO HIGH compared to its THREE TOP HEAD-ON COMPETITORS in OSLO. WHY should NORWAY investors PAY HIGHER PRICE to a NEWCOMER.... |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
01-Feb-2010 13:08
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
END GAME for Chins Fishery Group when DUAL LISITNG to showcase as the MOST EXPENSIVE competitor.... I GUESS THERE'S a time for everything, and the time had finally come for me to close the curtain on my investment in China Fishery. On the morning of January 21, 2010, I decided to divest my entire stake at about S$1.92, netting a gain of about 87% on my initial investment (excluding $220 in dividends). This decision was not made lightly, and follows on the heels of a somewhat love-hate relationship I have with this company, and also the turmoil and conflicts within myself during my ownership of it. Taking into account my total holding period of about 2 years 2 months, the annual return was approximately 40% (non-compounded). On the morning of January 21, China Fishery (“CFG”) announced its intention to dual-list (secondary offering of shares) on the Stock Exchange of Oslo Bors, located in Norway. The aim was to increase recognition of China Fishery as several fishing and fish processing companies were listed on Oslo Bors (there are currently three – Aker Seafoods, Leroy Seafood Group and Austevoll Seafood).
The listing would also raise the profile of CFG in Norway and Europe, where many of CFG’s customers and business partners are located. A third reason that was provided: the dual listing would attract institutional investors in Europe who would be able to trade CFG’s shares in two different time zones, thus improving the trading liquidity of the counter. Apparently, Management believed that going the dual-listing way would improve valuations and allow the counter to trade at a significantly higher valuation (and hence market price). The arguments and rationale are indeed compelling, but once you scratch under the surface and reveal the underside of things, it started to get questionable. I will present the facts and logic of my reason for divestment, and though I do not classify this strictly as an investment mistake per se, let’s say that I did learn a lot of lessons and will, in future, be a lot more cautious and exercise more due diligence and prudence in conducting my investment affairs. 1) Weak Balance Sheet, High Capex CFG’s Balance Sheet has always carried high debt, and this was a very uncomfortable aspect of the Company which precluded my original rationale for purchasing it (which was high barriers to entry, just to state the fact). In its most recent FY 2009 results (ended September 28, 2009), CFG stated that its net debt to equity had decreased from 92.2% to 84.3%, which was still uncomfortably high. Finance costs for 9M 2009 stood at US$20.7 million alone, and for 12M 2008 interest expenses went to as high as US$31.1 million, which was about 6.7% of revenues. Debt continues to be a prominent feature of CFG as it took on additional bank loans in 2009 to finance its South Pacific expansion, and also previously issued Senior Notes due 2013 to finance its capex for additional reefer vessels/supertrawlers and to acquire fishmeal processing plans. The Group’s plans to expand further will probably result in more re-financing of their loans in future, and more additional debt taken on in addition to the Notes issued and existing banking lines. All these make this Company a high risk investment, as its gearing is a little too high for comfort. 2) Frequent Fund-Raising and presence of Scrip Dividend It should become immediately apparent to the casual observer (and actually, to the astute investor, of which I am not), that the whole Pacific Andes Group has undergone frequent fund-raising. Pacific Andes Resources Development (PARD, formerly known as Pacific Andes Holdings Limited or PAH) recently concluded a 1-for-1 rights issue (announced May 22, 2009) of about 1.5 billion shares at S$0.15 per share, as well as 305 million detachable warrants at an exercise price of S$0.23 per share to raise a total of about S$300 million for working capital purposes. Previously, PARD had also issued 4% Convertible Bonds due 2012. Both CFG and PARD also have scrip dividend policies in place for FY 2009 dividend, in order to conserve cash; and it is estimated that the majority shareholders will choose scrip instead of cash, thereby diluting existing retail shareholders even further (for those who choose cash over scrip). Even in the previous year (i.e. FY 2008), CFG had a 1-for-10 bonus issue instead of a cash dividend, all in the name of further conserving cash. Thus, though the Cash Flow Statement of CFG shows an operating cash inflow of US$80 million for FY 2009, capex was US$119 million and new bank loans made up another US$178 million. This shows that the Group had consistently negative FREE CASH FLOWS, even though operating cash flows were mostly positive over the years. 3) Complex Group Structure I’ve always wondered about this point, and it was one of the points brought up by concerned investors as well as readers of my blog. The relationship between PAIH (listed in Hong Kong), PARD and CFG is very complex, and involves a lot of cross-holdings using companies such as Golden Target for example. The Complex Group structure makes it hard to really compute the valuation and profits to be accrued from CFG to parent PARD, for instance, and also complicates matters when it comes to understanding the impact of Group decisions made and also how policies made at the parent level will cascade down to the subsidiaries. In short, complexity is NOT good for the investor as it makes matters more opaque and offers less clarity into the affairs of a Company. This inherently increases risk as well, as one’s understanding is compromised. 4) Not fully in tune with the Group’s business I’ve realized over time that CFG’s business was not as simple to understand as I had previously thought. In the first place, there are the (Vessel Operating Agreements) VOA signed which are carried in the books as deferred expenses and deferred charter hire, and even the structure of the 4th VOA is not easily explained. Considering I am accounting trained and I don’t really understand the accounting treatment for these items says volumes about how ordinary retail investors must be able to understand these issues! There are also aspects such as pledging of inventory for loans, tracking of fishmeal prices, El Nino effects on the availability of fish and other aspects which are pretty hard to track and follow unless you have a good grasp of the industry and intimate knowledge of the operational aspects of the Group. Suffice to say I probably did not have the appropriate level of interest or inclination to dig out the facts to track the Company, and did not do enough detailed reading on the species of fish they caught (CJM and Peruvian Anchovy). Thus, I felt that this lack of understanding compromised my investment position and I was better off divesting my position since I did not truly understand the forces which affected the business. 5) Potential Dilution from Secondary Listing In case most investors out there have not realized, the proposed secondary listing for CFG actually involves the issuance of NEW shares to institutions and retail investors in Norway; and will cause dilution equivalent to a private placement of shares (assuming it had been done in Singapore). As at the time of the announcement, it was still not known of the issue size and pricing for the secondary listing, or whether or not Oslo Bors would approve the listing (there is a high chance they will, though). But what is immediately apparent is that CFG has to raise funds once again, and they are doing it through equity issuance this time instead of turning to debt (e.g. loans and senior notes). The FC of Pacific Andes Group acknowledged that this move would “dilute earnings” but will ultimately benefit the Company because of the working capital raised. This does imply that the Group has insufficient recurring cash to work on and always needs to turn to capital markets to raise funds. This share issuance will dilute not just earnings, but also future dividends as well as there will be an enlarged share capital base! 6) Peer Valuations on Oslo Bors According to a Lim and Tan Daily Review report, the other 3 seafood and fishing companies on Oslo Bors trade at around 8x-10x FY 2010 PER, and have a P/B of about 1.3x on average. CFG, on the other hand, is priced expensively at about 16x FY 2009 PER and 12x FY 2010 PER, and has a P/B of 3.4x. This seems to suggest that CFG is trading at elevated prices with respect to the other listed fishing companies in Norway, so I am not sure what kind of “improved valuations” the CEO was talking about. In fact, the P/B alone would probably signal that CFG may be trading at a premium price currently, with a lot of positives already factored in. For me, that’s my feel of the situation – a lot of the positives have been included in the share price, such as expansion into South Pacific, completion of their new mega-vessel The Lafayette, as well as implementation of the ITQ system. 7) Environmental Issues and Concerns about Over-fishing This was kindly highlighted to me by a fellow blogger called Donmihaihai, who also pointed out certain aspects of Ezra to me in his blog; and he has been a very astute and helpful investor who deeply analyzes the numbers and facts. He did mention on the sustainability of fishing resources, and highlighted the fact that such supertrawlers actually destroy many natural habitats and are not environmentally friendly. The environmentalists are fervently lobbying against stricter regulations against over-fishing, but the vessel Lafayette would probably put a spanner in their works as it is able to fish all year round, without having to re-fuel. Separately, I also had misgivings about being vested in China Fishery even though of course the Directors proclaim that they are adhering to international standards on over-fishing; but one has to take note that the South Pacific is a relatively new fishing ground and there are still inadequate legal controls over the fishing environment there. Therefore, one can argue that CFG would be left alone to do what it has to in order to “maximize shareholder value”. This was a nagging thought which stayed with me for quite some time, and I was unable to shake it off; and was a minor contributing factor to my decision to divest. The case of CFG may be classified as an investment thesis which was partially flawed, since I first purchased my shares in late 2007 when I had just switched to the value investing methodology. During that time, I did not do much in-depth research into my purchases as I do now, and it was also a bit of luck that I averaged down on my purchase subsequently during the 2008-2009 bear market; and the Company had managed to stay afloat during this trying period. I recall being very nervous and being unable to sleep well because of the high debt which the Group was holding; and also seeing many companies like Ferrochina, Celestial and Fibrechem encountering problems and being suspended from trading. I had told myself, after learning the harsh lessons of the previous bear market, that I would never again over-expose myself in this way through the ownership of a Company with such high gearing. Fortunately for me, the dual listing news came at an opportune time, as it raised a minor euphoria as had been expected from the recent announcements of dual listings from companies such as Z-Obee, Oceanus, Epure and Novo Group. I made use of the heightened expectations to sell and even though in the interim, the share price may scale new heights, there are no regrets as I had to move on to companies with better structures and with a less risky value proposition. Suffice to say that I now have the unenviable task of deciding how to allocate the monies freed up from this divestment; and I shall have to actively seek out investment opportunities in a climate of rising valuations. Overall, this has been a positive learning experience, and the profits and resulting cash inflow will bolster my cash reserves and allow me to scout around for more investment opportunities. The realized profits from the divestment of CFG will be reflected in my January 2010 portfolio review. The total dividends I had received from CFG over my entire holding period amounted to S$220, so the bulk of the gains came from capital gains. Moving forward, I hope to achieve a more balanced mix of dividends and capital gains from future investments. More time and effort will be spent researching such opportunities to avoid the mistakes made for CFG. This article was first published in Musicwhiz's blog (http://sgmusicwhiz.blogspot.com/) and is reproduced here with permission. http://www.nextinsight.net/content/view/2017/60/ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
marubozu1688
Veteran |
31-Jan-2010 01:06
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Need to see whether this Fish can continue to fly! http://mystocksinvesting.com/singapore-stocks/china-fishery/china-fishery-%e2%80%93-coming-back-to-test-the-support/ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
knightrider
Elite |
21-Jan-2010 10:32
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It announce on 2nd listing in Europe - I think Norway. Good Luck. Cheong liao, so now is time for its major share counter Pac Andes ! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hotstock
Veteran |
16-May-2009 10:06
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It is a good potential stock. Continued growth and bonus issue. Take it and wait for it to move up to at least 3 times current value. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
skyowner
Member |
15-May-2009 10:27
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Good news for China Fish holder: 40% yoy growth in revenue amidst global downturn! China Fishery Reports 1QFY2009 Results 15th May, 2009 Page 1 of 2 CHINA FISHERY REPORTS 1QFY2009 RESULTS
Singapore, 15 May 2009 For 1QFY2009, the Group recorded US$166.6 million in revenue, representing a 39.6% increase from US$119.3 million achieved a year ago. Profit attributable to shareholders amounted to US$43.7 million, representing a 8.2% increase over the US$40.4 million from the corresponding period last year. Basic earnings per share increased by 8.2% to US5.6 cents. Commenting on the Group’s business, Group Managing Director Mr Ng Joo Siang says, "We are satisfied with our performance in 1QFY2009. Our results show continued growth despite the global downturn. We believe that our performance also attest to China Fishery’s resilience, being in the staple food products industry. This, and the increasing preference for healthier diets among consumers, are persistent drivers for our growth. In addition, the higher catch volume and selling price of our fish products generated increased revenue for the Group." Trawling and fishmeal processing accounted for 81.0% and 19.0% of total revenue respectively. Trawling revenue increased by 38.5%, attributable to higher catch volumes and product prices. The increase in product prices was partly caused by the change in shipment terms from "at sea" to "port" deliveries. Revenue from fishmeal processing grew by 45.0% from US$21.8 million to US$31.6 million from sales of fishmeal inventory. China Fishery Reports 1QFY2009 Results 15 th May, 2009 Page 2 of 2The PRC remains the Group’s largest market, representing 71.8% of the total revenue in 1QFY2009. Sales to Japan and Korea accounted for 17.4%. Gross profit increased by 14.5% to US$60.9 million. The higher cost of sales and vessel operating expenses had a negative impact on gross profit. Vessel operating cost of the trawling operations increased by US$14.6 million, in line with higher segmental sales. Cost of sales of the fishmeal processing operations increased by US$10.4 million due to sale of fishmeal inventory brought forward from the last financial year. Vessel operating cost of fishmeal processing operations increased by US$11.4 million due to lower capitalisation of fixed overhead costs to inventory. This was attributed to low catch volumes in Peru which consequently led to lower production volume of fishmeal and fish oil. China Fishery maintained a solid balance sheet profile as at the end of the reporting period. The Group successfully received a new 3-year term loan of US$60 million to finance the expansion of its fishing operations to the South Pacific Ocean. Although total debt as at 31 March 2009 increased to US$361.4 million, net debt-to-equity ratio was reduced from 92.2% to 89.2% on higher retained earnings during this period. In view of the current volatile global financial market, China Fishery will continue to demonstrate financial discipline especially in the management of capital expenditure. Looking ahead, Mr. Ng said, "China Fishery will continue to implement its key strategy of securing more long-term access to under-utilised and sustainable fishery resources against a global backdrop of limited supply and increasing demand. Additionally, we will continue to place emphasis on efficiency enhancement to maximise profits from current operations. Our trawling operations are expected to deliver a higher volume of fish catch from its current fishing grounds. As planned, we will deploy more vessels to the South Pacific Ocean in the second half of 2009. With higher catch volumes and product prices, contribution from our trawling operations is expected to increase further. Leveraging on our solid under-lying strengths, we will strive to achieve our business objectives and deliver value to our shareholders." ### End ###
About China Fishery Group Limited Listed on the Singapore Exchange Mainboard in 2006, China Fishery Group Limited ("China Fishery") is a global integrated industrial fishing company with access to fish in some of the world's most important fishing grounds. Employing state-of-the-art supertrawlers, China Fishery harvests, onboard processes and delivers high quality catch to consumers the world over. In 2006, China Fishery also established fishmeal processing operations in Peru, where it has fishmeal processing plants and purse seine fishing vessels deployed strategically along Peru's coastal areas. Riding on an ever-growing global demand for fish, China Fishery is committed to continually securing access to underutilised and abundant ocean resources, and fulfilling the needs of the health and value-conscious consumer through sustainable fishing practices. – Singapore Exchange Mainboard-listed industrial fishing company China Fishery Group Limited ("China Fishery" or the "Group")(SGX:B0Z.SI) today reported results for the first quarter of the financial year ending 31 December 2009 ("1QFY2009").
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
787180
Master |
17-Apr-2009 09:52
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Shot up to high of 78cts since april 2....Fish wake up already
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
787180
Master |
03-Apr-2009 13:19
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Fish has shaken some lethargy...now trading a post March high at 64.5cts ahen STI tested 1400 level,but ChinaFish with impending bonus shd remain resilient as Board has approved bonus in lieu of dividends to conserve cash | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
787180
Master |
28-Mar-2009 23:15
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I am a trader,10- 20cts lost I cut already..will not wait for it to drop further...lah..yes but my gains are way above the losses and i am using the gains to play again thereby preventing any capital erosion...I've been buying shares since my undergrad days when I bought SIA at $5.....loses are expected but keep it minimal and ensure U make overall that is . impt,,..anyway this thread is about ChinaFish..buy or sell is for U to decide not me but everyone is entitled to his/her own opinions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01101749
Member |
28-Mar-2009 09:24
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I think you got my ID mix up with some one else. I got nothing to do with Biosensor. im commenting on your profit in general. as everyone will show their profit and not their losses. Honesty? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
787180
Master |
27-Mar-2009 19:30
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
So the one who lost heavily in Biosensor by following bengster to buy...haha 01101749.while i shot BIG and reap good profits...thought U disappear together with yr Kakhis altogether,...whether I made and u don't beliveve is not important most impt the $$$ is in my bank...ready to shoot down yr Biosensor shd it overshot $1.10 again..wait long long lah....
|