Crude oil prices have been at all-time records this month and markets seem to be convincing themselves that the once-unimaginable level of $100 per barrel may soon be achieved.
The effect of oil prices in the 1970s is notorious. They twice led to severe recessions in the developed world and equity bear markets. Why has nothing similar happened yet in the current surge in oil prices?
New research by Veronique Riches-Flores of Société Générale suggests the market has not been foolish in shrugging off higher prices so far. But it also suggests much more appreciation in oil prices would be hard to bear. She uses the concept of the ?oil burden? ? the volume of oil consumed multiplied by the average price and divided by nominal gross domestic product. This gives the proportion of the world economy devoted to buying oil.
On this analysis, oil was very cheap in the late 1990s and in this decade before the invasion of Iraq triggered the long-term rise in crude prices. With the world economy growing steadily, the oil burden at the end of the second quarter of this year was well below the level it touched in the middle of last year (when high oil prices did appear to weigh on the stock market). It was no higher than the levels seen in 2005. So this is the ?barrel half-full? argument: oil price inflation has not outstripped economic growth.
Ms Riches-Flores does have a ?barrel half-empty? argument, however. If prices are sustained at around their current levels, or even move forward to $100, then, she says, the most recent trends in crude oil prices might be more difficult to absorb.
With the reference price for the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries at $81, it is 45 per cent higher than a year ago. At the end of the second quarter, worldwide nominal GDP had risen only 13 per cent. That puts the ?oil burden? on a path to its highest level in more than a decade.