Latest Forum Topics / Keppel Land | Post Reply |
Kepland
|
|||||
freeme
Elite |
12-Jul-2009 22:07
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
i tink wont affect much. but kepland's share px seems likely to fall further b4 reverse..
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
iPunter
Supreme |
12-Jul-2009 22:06
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Many stocks have tanked (as opposed to consolidating for a continued uprun)... | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
fartist
Member |
12-Jul-2009 21:55
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Ok it would be irresponsible if i used the word defintely. What i meant was that i feel that it's a good thing, sorry typed too fast earlier without thinking.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
fartist
Member |
12-Jul-2009 21:54
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
"By combining the operational expertise, industry knowledge and extensive networks of both companies, Keppel Land will be in an even stronger position to capture opportunities and growth in China. " Defintely good news. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
dealer0168
Elite |
12-Jul-2009 21:53
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Sorry i mean Kepland, typo error. Btw it seems that they fully acquired Evergro, purpose is for China projects purposes......
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
dealer0168
Elite |
12-Jul-2009 21:49
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Is a good news. As Keppel is acquiring another company. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Peg_li
Master |
12-Jul-2009 21:17
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
How will it affect kepland shares prices?good or bad? any advice?
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
ticklish8
Senior |
12-Jul-2009 21:04
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
dont know leh... press release just come out..... Proposed voluntary delisting of Evergro Properties Limited Keppel Land Limited (“Keppel Land”) and Evergro Properties Limited (“Evergro”) today jointly announced (“Joint Announcement”) the proposed voluntary delisting (“Delisting Proposal”) of Evergro from the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (“SGX-ST”). |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
maxcty
Master |
12-Jul-2009 20:59
Yells: "always a learning day for me in trading" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
something bad??
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
ticklish8
Senior |
12-Jul-2009 20:55
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Singapore, 12 July 2009 You can access the press release at:
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
maxcty
Master |
09-Jul-2009 23:55
Yells: "always a learning day for me in trading" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
hope to see some more advance for this counter....not moving much as compare to Capitaland | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
dealer0168
Elite |
09-Jul-2009 19:28
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
that maybe the difference between a trader n a investor for this counter . (my opinion) Emm but fr some stock, I will trade in short term too. So that means sometimes I can be a trader too. Only good n solid stock worth to go fOr long as investment. (Again just my opinion) | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
ticklish8
Senior |
09-Jul-2009 19:18
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I think if I am a trader, kena heart attack, yesterday kena property counters kena sold down, today up.... July 9 (Bloomberg) – CapitaLand Ltd., Singapore’s biggest developer, led a rebound by local builders after the city’s government said a proposed income tax reform was “not an anti- speculation measure.” CapitaLand gained 3.6 percent to S$3.50 at the close in Singapore, reversing a 4.8 percent fall yesterday. City Developments Ltd., the city’s second-biggest homebuilder, climbed 5.5 percent to S$8.31. The FTSE ST Real Estate Index declined 2.5 percent yesterday after the Straits Times newspaper reported the proposed tax changes. The Finance Ministry said today that the reform will clarify tax rules for individuals selling only one property within a four-year period. “The market misread the intention of the change,” Brandon Lee, an analyst with at DMG & Partners Securities Pte. Investors had feared the new rule would have a similar effect to a 1996 regulation that prohibited Singaporeans from selling property within three years, Lee said. The proposed tax change, scheduled to take effect from January 2010, won’t change anything for people who sell more than one property in a four-year period, the ministry said. Keppel Land Ltd., partly owned by the world’s biggest builder of oil rigs, advanced 3.9 percent to S$2.16. Allgreen Properties Ltd., a Singapore-based developer controlled by Malaysian billionaire Robert Kuok, jumped 3.9 percent to 94.5 Singapore cents. For Related News and Information: Singapore property data: SREL GO Top real estate news: TOP REL GO Today’s top news: TOP GO Top South, Southeast Asia news: TOP SAS GO –Editors: Nick Gentle, Neil Denslow To contact the reporters on this story: Jonathan Burgos in Singapore at +65-6212-1156 or Jburgos4@bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Darren Boey at +852-2977-6646 or dboey@bloomberg.net. -0- Jul/09/2009 10:43 GMT 07-09-09 0643EDT |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
dealer0168
Elite |
09-Jul-2009 19:10
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Now don't buy, a few yrs down the road u may say Aiya that time the price is at very good discount, should have buy.
Haha, its human nature.
Btw current pricing is actually quite attractive already.
My opinion is similar to Mr Goh, a good long term investment stock.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
limkt009
Veteran |
09-Jul-2009 17:41
Yells: "Watch your front, grab $$$$$ at your own time" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Totally agree with your viewpoint of Kepland in 5-year timeframe. At this point in time and given the current situation of impending economy recovery, taking a longer term view of investment can be rewarding and is never wrong. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
denn_goh
Member |
09-Jul-2009 17:34
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Mm .. i loaded at 2.56 wor, i also nv sell. Actually instead of selling i am waiting to buy more if hit 2.00 :) because property will nv drop in singapore. More with government allowing more foreign to come in to snatch our house. Just hold on for 5 yrs, see will earn not. Anyway better than putting in bank mah. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
erictkw
Veteran |
09-Jul-2009 12:07
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
DJ MARKET TALK: S'pore Ppty Stks Recovering; Selloff Overdone-UBS 0223 GMT [Dow Jones] Singapore property developers recovering from yesterday's selloff, which was driven by worries over proposed changes to property gains tax. City Developments (C09.SG) +2.2% at S$8.05, Capitaland (C31.SG) +0.9% at S$3.41, Keppel Land (K17.SG) +1.4% at S$2.11 vs STI +1.3%. UBS says market misinterpreted tax proposals as government only intended to provide clarity on existing tax law, not impose new laws or tighten current ones. Says, "we would be surprised if the government were to slip in a major change in the tax code in such a stealthy manner"; adds property stocks were "unfairly penalized" in yesterday's selloff. DMG meanwhile says jitters only temporary, share price weakness is chance to buy, "with the Marina Bay Integrated Resort's opening in early 2010, stocks and physical prices should resume their upward trend following this short-term blip, which represents a good entry point." Though charts show thin traded volumes, suggests buying interest fairly tentative, near-term rebound potential may be capped. (KIG) |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
pasttime
Member |
08-Jul-2009 16:21
Yells: "." |
||||
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
what i see is if you r small time speculator. once in 4 years is ok. let you go. if u r big timmer setup companies to hold then sell the companies if needed. worse case pay bit of tax on profit also not problem. important thing is must have profit. ie no big deal all in all. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Kassanne
Member |
08-Jul-2009 16:01
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I think they should take into account how long the individual has hold the property for. If an individual holds two property for 10 years and had to sell within the four year period, he/she should not be penalised. Maybe he/she need money urgently.. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
ticklish8
Senior |
08-Jul-2009 15:58
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The changes to the tax rule is not good to the property counters - ie u will be tax if you sell your second property within 4 years. Me rethinking whether should buy Kepland when it drop below $2. A bit confuse. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |