Latest Forum Topics /
Thomson Medical
Last:0.048
+0.001
|
 Post Reply
|
|
Things you might want to know before buying
|
|||
|
tonylim
Master |
26-Dec-2012 09:09
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Wow breaking another high at 3.10
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
teeth53
Supreme |
26-Dec-2012 08:55
Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life " |
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
There is gap to fill, opening may again gap up...do take fast n quick profit B4 it stay stagging... Happi Speculating. |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|
|||
|
louis_leecs
Elite |
26-Dec-2012 08:47
Yells: "half cash" |
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Rowsley ck swift to informatics,get ready for pxx hse to push,,,,today is informatics century,,,,,,buy | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
teeth53
Supreme |
26-Dec-2012 08:39
Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life " |
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Valued by biggest vested BBs for oni 15c, so players will 1 2 play up say to just about $0.295c...happily been manipulated n do take some profit. one will never know or be able to beat those BBs when the axe will fall. | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
medivh
Elite |
26-Dec-2012 08:30
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Gosh.... haha Why ppl think that stock chiong is cause of fundamentals? Let me give you an example -> > > Yoma... (last year 2011 dec it was only a penny worth 10c..Now where is it?) When BBs want to play (long or short).. just ride the waves.. IMO: Have a profit target and cut loss plan, and always have bullets for times like this (" ,) |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|
|||
|
halleluyah
Elite |
26-Dec-2012 08:20
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Am thinking of shorting it tdy if reach 0.29 as it went up too much n too fast in just 2 dys.
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
teeth53
Supreme |
26-Dec-2012 08:06
Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life " |
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
would wish to thk u for making effort to sharing ur view n opinion regarding Rowsley share value, purely shares been manipulated by vested BBs. teeth53: on sharing my thot... |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
teeth53
Supreme |
26-Dec-2012 08:06
Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life " |
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
would wish to thk u for making effort to sharing ur view n opinion regarding Rowsley share value, purely shares been manipulated by vested BBs. teeth53: on sharing my thot... |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|
|||
|
WallStreet3
Member |
26-Dec-2012 03:55
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
So, 2 things of concern : 1. non-binding terms sheets (an binding agreement would sound nice, but a 'non-binding' terms sheets is not too convincing enough) 2. when share price jumped +160% 'too fast and too furious', guess it will attract a fair share of strong short-sellers.....?
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
WallStreet3
Member |
26-Dec-2012 03:06
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I am NOT saying Rowsley share price will go up or go south .......because I dont know : ) (Quoting Wallstreet Movie " if you're not inside, you are outside" ) But reading the media article again and again, I found these words " non-binding term sheets" means....? I am not a professional but " non-binding term sheets" may mean terms can be altered and can be non-binding, right ? So: 1. if deal ok with proposed terms, rowsley share price may go up. but is $0.25 - $0.30 / share too high or ? since all shares purchase basis $0.15 / share. 2. if deal did not go thru (deal not confirmed yet as now only " non-binding term sheets" ?), then rowsley share price may go back to $0.05 - $0.10 / share ? All i notice is rowsley share price jumped from $0.10...... $0.15............ $0.26 'too fast and too furious'..... ( about + 160% increase ) Maybe my analysis is wrong (any experts here can comment more/better info or other analysis, i want to learn ~ thanks !) |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
WallStreet3
Member |
26-Dec-2012 02:39
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
So, if basis Rowsley as an individual entity alone, and basis its net assets, as well as its Rev + profit / loss performance, it would be fair to say Rowsley share price may be worth less than $0.05 - $0.10 / share. So, I ask myself this question, then why did RSP if worth $223 mil, keen on all shares agreement with a company that has net assets of only about $30 - 40 mil (based on Annual Report)? 3 reasons I can only guess: 1. backdoor listing ? ==> question again, why RSP not going for direct IPO listing then ? 2. PL helping PL ? Vantage helping Rowsley ? 3. So I ask myself Questions, questions again..., if without the all shares purchase of the land (valued at $358 mil) by Rowsley, would RSP be keen on the M& A with Rowsley ? ==> having said this, is the land parcel valuation sale of $358 mil a 'premium or the opposite' to Vantage ? Note : it is not cash purchase, it is all-shares purchase. |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
WallStreet3
Member |
26-Dec-2012 02:22
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Phew, I spent hours trying to analyze ....CORRECT me if i am wrong .... Rowsley : a company with 'not much revenue' and make a loss of about $ 4 million (based on the Annual Report) Net Assets about $30 - 40 mil only PL owning about 30% in it . RSP Architects : not sure how much it is worth if based on its audited reports, but based on proposed about $223 mil ? (all shares only, not cash) Vantage Bay Sdn Bhd (PL 70% Johor 30% ?) : proposed land sale to Rowsley for $358 mil ? (all shares only, not cash) Please note PL haves substantial stakes in both Rowsley (about 30% ?) and Vantage (70% ?) |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||