Latest Forum Topics / Others | Post Reply |
how do you cope with your losses
|
|||||
teeth53
Supreme |
07-Mar-2009 16:55
Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life " |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Just more...(FYI only) teeth53 thot changes got to come, rather then going back to business as usual http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3859 (Chirst Dodd - US Senator for connecticut), U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee Chairman. www.Banking.Senate.govAs Chairman, Senator Dodd sets the committee’s agenda; guiding the consideration of legislation under committee jurisdiction. http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/magazines/fortune/colvin_bonus.fortune/index.htm Chris Dodd wants to scrap bonus "lavish Wall Street bonuses"
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
teeth53
Supreme |
07-Mar-2009 16:20
Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life " |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Just FYI only...some of this is going to happen http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/news/dodd.fdic.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2009030700 Fear of a big collapse continues to rise as Washington prepares for big bank failure, 5 biggest U.S. bank holding companies - Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), Citi, JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), Wells Fargo and Wachovia, which is now owned by Wells - had domestic deposits of between $271 billion and $701 billion at the end of the 2nd Q of 2008, according to the most recent data available from the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corp) chief Sheila Bair, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. All three recently wrote Dodd to support an emergency expansion of the FDIC's capacity to borrow from the Treasury. To borrow as much as $500 billion from the government to shore up the deposit insurance fund. Shares of Citigroup (C, Fortune 500), the giant financial company last week received a 3rd round of government aid, have fallen 58% since the government outlined a plan to convert the bank's preferred shares to common stock, fear has given way, it dropped below $1. Citi plan aimed to ease market concerns about the bank's health. But fears have only increased, judging by the swoon in financial stocks the sharp rise in the cost of protecting financial-sector debt against default. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
iPunter
Supreme |
07-Mar-2009 13:42
|
||||
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
The reason why this bear market is more likely than not to continue going lower is that more and more (reluctant) long-term holders (as opposed to investors*) will find it harder to survive in this big bad bear market. Thus, because of the extent of the bad times, more such people will be needing cash badly. And thus many will eventually sell out to realise the much needed cash for mere survival and to tide them over. In such bad times, who can afford the $luxury$ of investing long term? The big boys certainly know this, and thus will withhold committing their funds all out. They will be the ones who will indeed buy cheap-cheap later on when the time is ripe... (*Long-term holders are often wrongly called 'investors' because they are not investors at all! This is because real investors will know when to take their hard-earned profits out of the market before any savage carnage takes place to nullify their profits). |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
trader88.sg
Veteran |
07-Mar-2009 08:32
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Cannot agree with you more.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
CWQuah
Master |
07-Mar-2009 02:10
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The market is always right, anytime. All other trade participants may be right SOME of the time.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
iPunter
Supreme |
06-Mar-2009 18:54
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
About book value in below posts... At any given time, market value is the only true value... Book value is based on nett tangible assets value, nett intangible assets value... etc, etc... which is a fair gauge in itself. But have you ever asked yourself why there are no takers even at below book value? It is precisely because of its market value... when 'cheap-cheap' can be 'expensive'... (in a roaring bull market, 'expensive' can be 'dirt cheap') ... |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
iPunter
Supreme |
06-Mar-2009 17:48
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This is one piece of great superb stuff around... Better print it out and treasure it like gold ... and it's free too... hehehe.. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
Hulumas
Supreme |
06-Mar-2009 16:19
Yells: "INVEST but not TRADE please!" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I call this trading stimulus/motivated posting. Ha. ha.. ha...
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
derricktan
Member |
06-Mar-2009 14:52
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Twin Pillars of Failure: Stubbornness and Pride (March 1, 2009)
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wongmx6
Veteran |
06-Mar-2009 12:33
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I don't really agree because the Volume is too low to justify. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
trader88.sg
Veteran |
06-Mar-2009 12:24
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Definitely not at the book value. The fair value should be the traded market price.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wongmx6
Veteran |
06-Mar-2009 12:11
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I tend to agree with what you've mentioned but at current share price, so depress!!!! DBS, NOL, F&N are trading below its Book value. If someone wanted to buy over. What price to you think he need to pay???
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
iPunter
Supreme |
06-Mar-2009 11:26
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yes... |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
trader88.sg
Veteran |
06-Mar-2009 11:04
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The topic on "Paper loss vs Real loss" has been discussed here in SJ as well as other forums countless times already and yet many are still not convinced that paper loss = real loss.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
iPunter
Supreme |
06-Mar-2009 10:50
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This thing called "paper loss" is such a big big lie (ie. bluff) by the general investment community itself that nearly every stock player is hoodwinked into thinking since it's only a 'paper' loss, it is not a loss and suggests that it is guranteed that some time in the future, the loss will be recovered. Well, common sense will tell even any thinking kindergarten child that it is already a loss !... |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
iPunter
Supreme |
06-Mar-2009 10:42
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Well... that may be an gross exaggeration, but just so the point is put through... A loss is a real loss... it is already an accomplished fact... If you have not bought that stock/s, you would not have lost (real $$$)! And tomorow's uncertainties are also just as real... |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
AK_Francis
Supreme |
06-Mar-2009 10:39
Yells: "Happy go lucky, cheers." |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Ha ha, seriously, not stock ah. Lately, got one angmo both missing arms were transplanted sucessfully, so far so good. But Ip notes valid loh. Cheers.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
trader88.sg
Veteran |
06-Mar-2009 10:33
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Good analogy. But if arm is bitten off by shark, there is NO WAY it will grow back!
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
iPunter
Supreme |
06-Mar-2009 00:05
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It's just like a person whose arm is bitten off by a shark... But the point is... it may not grow back! ... But with stocks, it may go even lower even as you keep denying... hehehe...
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
trader88.sg
Veteran |
05-Mar-2009 23:04
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
...which is to trade on technicals!
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |