| Latest Forum Topics / Genting HK USD |
 Post Reply
|
|
Is it time to enter now?
|
|
|
kodiak
Senior |
09-May-2007 12:45
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
hi hikitty, glad u still hold some hope on sc ... true -i looked at the charts, it looks good. but probably lack some factors for it to kickstart .... i am retaining my little hope for it to sail north one day  |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
zhirong_thann
Member |
09-May-2007 12:11
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Holiday time soon so time to get on SC b4 it sails off |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
hikitty
Master |
09-May-2007 12:10
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi waterfalls True, the charts look promising, and your sharp reading. But, there is no movement north, a hint of a breakout. What makes you think a breakout is pending.?In fact, two brokers previously suggested that possibility more than two weeks ago. Buy now at support prices, before SC sails away!!! |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
hikitty
Master |
09-May-2007 09:09
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi kodiak Hv not given up hope on SC. Just stating my view - hope to be proved wrong. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
zhirong_thann
Member |
08-May-2007 22:50
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Dear all, based on my past few weeks monitoring, I agree with Hulumas that now is the time to buy in the shares. Buy in price will be from $0.29 to $0.3. The BB wont let it drop past $0.285 as compared to the last dip. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
kodiak
Senior |
08-May-2007 22:46
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
hi hikitty, i noticed that u have changed your stance towards sc - u hv given out hope on it?? |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
Hulumas
Supreme |
08-May-2007 22:19
Yells: "INVEST but not TRADE please!" |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Dear Readers, It comes to my collection time to this share again ha... ha... ha... |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
hikitty
Master |
05-May-2007 22:52
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi Hulumas Sorry if the following remarks offend you. SC will take many many years to become a non-speculative stock. Some of us may not be alive to see that happen. Reasons for it being speculative: (a) An ever growing float size (b) Weak fundamentals - has not been profitable every year (c) no earnings visibility. Imagine SC called for rights issues in three years,(if my memory is not faulty) since 2002. With an ever growing float size, how much north can its share price move? Think about that. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
Hulumas
Supreme |
05-May-2007 18:10
Yells: "INVEST but not TRADE please!" |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Dear Hikitty, I seriously consider, Star Cruises Limited is the invisible future DIAMOND with the BANANA price!!! I wish I could buy the whole shares, if only I could!!! |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
waterfalls
Senior |
04-May-2007 23:47
Yells: "Investing is calculated risk, patience n luck" |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Great..The chart looks promising ! Possible breakout soon. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
KiLrOy
Master |
04-May-2007 22:53
Yells: "I buy only what I can see." |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Must learn to read between the lines and make your own judgement call. Sad to say these recommendations are at times used as 'an edge' on retail investors. Else why do they always have a tiny whinny disclaimer message at the bottom for every recommendation if its going to be like what they say. :p. You BUY [so that they can] SELL. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
harryp
Veteran |
04-May-2007 15:51
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Don't know whether this broker's info is good or bad. "Goldman Sachs has downgraded its call on Star Cruises Ltd to "neutral" from "buy", deeming the stock fairly valued at the current price. " |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
hikitty
Master |
04-May-2007 15:30
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi Hulumas At the rate SC is cruising, hyperlong hold before it rebounds may be another four years, if its previous dip from 2005 to 2006 (two long years) is used as a guide. High in Jan 2005 was then 0.385 and low 18 cts.. High in Jan 2007 was 57cts (64cts and below - low volumes). It's just my humble suggestion (no offence intended) not to buy any more SC as it dips - it's as good as throwing money away at SC which has recurring "weak" fundamentals . Why fall into the invisible hands of the BBs by picking up their crumbs? Not sure whether we can live for several decades to see SC turn around - the turnaround be weak by then. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
Hulumas
Supreme |
03-May-2007 20:02
Yells: "INVEST but not TRADE please!" |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Dear Readers, I say no more, but keep accumulation while it dips and hold for several decades investment time horizon!!!!!!!! I am proud to say that it will be my major most potential static hyper long term share holding in my stocks portfolio!!!!!!!! |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
ruanlai
Master |
03-May-2007 19:32
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
VOTING RESULTS AT THE SPECIAL GENERAL MEETING HELD ON 2 MAY 2007 The board of Directors is pleased to announce that the ordinary resolution as set out in the notice of the SGM in respect of the approval, ratification and confirmation of the terms of, and the Company?s entry into of, the Sentosa SPA and the transactions contemplated thereunder was duly passed by the Independent Shareholders by way of poll at the SGM. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
hikitty
Master |
03-May-2007 18:24
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi zenki81 Genting did not pay a premium for SC's 25% in the IR - that's why SC shares did not move north after the announcement (details shd be on SGX website). Looks as if all SC investors will have to wait indefinitely for SC to move north unless there's a fresh catalyst (such ase Stanley buying up more SC shares or SC having more shares in the Macau investment) |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
zenki81
Member |
03-May-2007 17:55
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi, Does anyone here has the update on the meeting on the Disposal of the IR shares? Would this news push up SC? Thank. :) |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
geojam
Member |
30-Apr-2007 11:28
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Eastonbay I was wondering where have u disappeared. At least now i know u are working full time.Hah,i rem.in IT profession. I have my selection criteria when buying shares but i respect ur decision to vest in SC. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
EastonBay
Master |
30-Apr-2007 11:09
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Geojam, yes I am though not much and for very long term. That's why I'm in this thread. It really doesn't make sense that I seem to 'talk down' this counter when I'm vested. Actually I am just trying to stay neutral because I noticed some forumers here are overly passionate and optimistic. btw, some sort of 'jinx' statement by you the other time when you remarked that I could post in the day. That 2 days I was on most of the time cos' I was free. Then your statement came (coincidentally) followed by I got so busy that there were almost no post for one week!!! So, I keep my fingers crossed that it won't happen again today since I'm posting in the day again. Most of my post happens around mid night because I take SJ as my bedtime reading!! |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
geojam
Member |
30-Apr-2007 10:44
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Eastonbay Do not mean to kay poh Are u vested in SC? |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |