Latest Forum Topics / Baker Technology Last:0.615 -- | Post Reply |
It's time to rebound ????
|
|||||
grandmaster89
Veteran |
21-May-2010 10:52
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
They should have just taken the $59 million offer. They would have made over $50 million profit in that deal... | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wishbone
Master |
21-May-2010 10:49
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
As I said before in this forum.With the saga, BT can be worse off than it previous was. Suppose to be a potential gem may now become a germ. Sad story. I think this counter is Game Over for the time being unless there is drastic change in the event as it unfolds. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
chunshyang
Member |
20-May-2010 22:57
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
SELL all you have. Selling trend. Eventhough market picking up a bit next week, not wise to invest. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
buysell
Member |
20-May-2010 22:52
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
the market has been dropping for straight 6 days. In 2008, there was once the market dropped for straight 7 days so i reckon tomorrow is a good day to buy at discounted rate. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
louis_leecs
Elite |
20-May-2010 22:23
Yells: "half cash" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
THERE ALWAYS CALL MARGIN,,,FORCE SELLING AND COME ALONGS WITH PACNICS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SO CASH IS KING |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
pharoah88
Supreme |
20-May-2010 11:19
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
What Dirty Secret is in the JVA that cannot see the sunlight ? | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wishbone
Master |
20-May-2010 10:16
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Ya, may be "cheong low kee" (rushing down). Haha !!!!
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
iPunter
Supreme |
20-May-2010 10:00
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
You mean it should "cheong"?... hehehe... |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
L.....
Veteran |
20-May-2010 09:51
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
aiyo, things turn so sour... hahaha
abit drama lor
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wishbone
Master |
20-May-2010 09:42
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Look like BT is getting backfired unless otherwise the claim by SCM is not conclusive. Whatever happens in the end BT and SCM will be the loser and not YZJ which in the worst case, just not able to buy PPL only. The law suit will be bad for both BT and SCM. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
shplayer
Elite |
20-May-2010 09:07
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
See BusinessTimes article below. After purportly divulging the contents of the JVA to YZJ, Baker Tech, thru PPLH, tried to get SCM to agree to make public the JVA....prossibly to entrap SCM, if they agreed, to cause the lawsuit to disslove the JVA to be nullified. However, looks like SCM did not take the bait. Personnal opinion. BusinessTimes 15 May 2010
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
buysell
Member |
19-May-2010 23:27
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Confidentiality clause on management control ? I don't know but isn't there any way to gain access to that info for public? Not that BT secretly divulge the know how & skill set to YZJ, so what's the basis SCM wants to contest? |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
louis_leecs
Elite |
19-May-2010 22:51
Yells: "half cash" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
SOON CAN SEE AGAIN AT 30CTS |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wishbone
Master |
19-May-2010 17:14
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Suppose to be a can of sweet and nice candy and now look like it has become a can of worms. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
shplayer
Elite |
19-May-2010 16:43
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
From the announcements of Baker, SCM, YZJ and Businesstimes, these are the crux of the matter: 1. Seems that SCM's lawsuit is based on BT breaching the JVA confidentiality clause.....thereby dissolving the JVA. Note...the JVA gives BT management control of PPL. 2. In my opinion, I think BT did breach this confidentiality clause. They must have highlighted the management control clause to YZJ, otherwise why would YZJ have paid such a princeling premium for a mere 15% stake in PPL if they did not have this reassurance. As a 15% shareholding without management control, YZJ would not have achieved their objective of technology transfer. Bear in mind, PPL owns proprietary offshore rig designs....Jack ups and semis. 3. In either the JVA or shareholders agreement, there must have been a 'right of first refusal' clause in the event either shareholder wants to sell their stake in PPL. I suspect there is also a price formula to determine the purchase/sell price between BT and SCM....otherwise how did SCM come up with such an exacting figure of S$59,433,522 they countered for the 15% stake. 4. Whatever the outcome is, if YZJ gets the 15%, they will find it difficult to get a hold of the technology transfer. If YZJ gets out of the deal (which I think they are probably looking seriously at this option now...as the issue is getting too messy), the relationship between SCM and BT is certainly soured and SCM will certainly try to wrest management control of PPL, going forward. Not vested in BT, SCM and YZG....so my opinions have no vested interest...but tracking this corporate tussel makes interesting read. Personnal opinion. Caveat emptor. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wishbone
Master |
19-May-2010 16:36
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
As I said before, BT may become worse than before the offer from YZJ. | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
ohm136
Member |
19-May-2010 16:07
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Without miracle, the event will unfold when the cows come home! | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
belgeran
Veteran |
17-May-2010 20:25
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
hrm.. why not look at the court proceedings as a form of delay tatic instead? while the proceedings is going on, the deal can't go through, could it be.. 1) SCM will be able to 'remove' most of the 'key components' in PPL, be it manpower, equipment, technology.. 2) delaying tatic to make YZJ look for other opportunities in the market instead? 3) maybe it is as true as what the lawsuit is :/ Just speculating ;) |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
wishbone
Master |
17-May-2010 19:15
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Thing is definitely not so straight forward mah!!!! If not, all lawyers will eat grass liao!!! And we do not need to have courts. Now, the crux of the matter is not really whether all the claims are true or the offer and acceptance of the deal, but rather on the turn of the event. It is definitely not good or beneficial to the shareholders and may end up all become losers ( SCM, YZJ, BT, PPL including shareholders) Sigh !!!! |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
buysell
Member |
17-May-2010 18:50
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Think about it, BT stated in their announcement that they had seek legal advice on the offer by YZJ . If there's any clause that deem to be a possible breach of contract, would BT want to risk it ? However, Sembmarine probably trying to make their own stand but not necessary be in their favor. Well, let's watch the battle but I bet who will emerged the winners. Let's just say size doen't matter. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |