Latest Posts By Peter_Pan - Supreme About Peter_Pan |
|
02-Sep-2013 09:38 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Now is to see what will be Indoagri's offer price...if above $1...Glaucus can go holland liao... | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
02-Sep-2013 09:04 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Siao liao... | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
02-Sep-2013 08:55 | Olam Intl / OLAM_OLAM Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 1 |
Muddy Waters, LLC www.muddywatersresearch.com info@muddywatersresearch.com Olam International: Strong Sell September 2, 2013 Director of Research: Carson C. Block, Esq.  Not Changing the Old Ways We continue to believe that, in a world where capital is allocated to maximize economic  efficiency, Olam?s shares have no value. The Company has simply borrowed too much  money, and then invested in projectsthat will not generate sufficient returns to repay its  debt obligations. In this note, we will only briefly comment on Olam?s FY 2013 results.  (Numerous analysts have already done so.) Instead, we will focus on qualitative points  that cause us to believe Olam is not really turning over a new leaf. Olam?s FY 2013 results display the pathologies we noted in November 2012: ? Adjusted return on average assets was only 1.8%. (We adjusted net income to  S$261.8 million by excluding from Olam?s operational profit after tax all  biological gains and changes in measurement of derivatives. 1 For an explanation  of how and why we make adjustments to Olam?s net income, see our initial report  dated November 26, 2012.) ? Allowance for doubtful accounts more than halved from S$22.6 million to S$9.6  million, which made FY 2013 a less unfavorable a comparison to FY 2012. ? Inventory write-downs were only S$115,000, versus S$15 million last year, which  also made FY 2013 a less unfavorable comparison to FY 2012. ? Free cash burn was S$800.4 million, and Olam spent S$1.1 billion on acquisitions  and investments in FY 2013. The big picture issue is that we are skeptical Olam will operate differently in the future. ? There have been no changes to the board since our initial report. This board had  been complacent, at best, as Olam went on its borrowing and spending binge. It  was evidently more concerned with the messenger than the message when we first  spoke critically of the Company.  Olam?s board has ossified. The average tenure of Olam?s independent directors is  11.4 years. Olam?s IPO was only eight years ago. Only one independent director  1 We do not ignore asset impairment charges because we see these as a likely understated, and recurring  function of Olam?s business. Page 2has been appointed since Olam?s IPO, and that was five years ago. These  gentlemen have become too vested in Olam?s mistakes to deal with them  effectively. ? CEO Sunny Verghese said nothing during the call, which might be interpreted as  the Company transitioning to a future without Mr. Verghese. However, what  would really change if Mr. Verghese were no longer CEO? Olam has a tightknit  ? probably insular ? core of top managers who have worked together for many  years. Were the Company?s new leadership to come from the existing pool of top  management, which seems to lack diversity of views, what would really change?  ? Olam continued to essentially invent its own performance metricsin a  continuation of past less-than-best practices. For the FY 2013 results, Olam altered its definition of free cash flow, thereby excluding cash interest, taxes, and  certain working capital account changes. (Our initial report explains the  irrelevance of Olam?s invented gross and net contribution metrics.) ? Olam was asked what its average cost of debt is, and Mr. Anatharaman did not  answer the question with any specificity. ? More birds in the bush are better than one in the hand. Olam steadfastly refuses  to provide real transparency into the Gabon fertilizer project. Reading between  the lines, Tata Chemicals (?TCL?) is highly unlikely to participate in the project.  Rather than acknowledging this, Olam stated that it is happily looking for more  possible partners who are willing to buy in (so that Olam can sell down). We  believe the reality is that TCL no longer views the project as attractive (if it ever  did). Our recommendation is that Olam fall on the sword, admit to investors it  wasted significant money on dredging, and terminate the project. ? This brings up perhaps the most significant point: Despite Olam?s new strategic  plan that calls for capital spending to be curtailed (notwithstanding the Company  responding to our initial criticism by defiantly pledging to increase capex and  investment), Olam has not admitted having had a problem. In other words, the  Company has not acknowledged that it made a number of investments that will  not ?gestate? into returns in excess of their costs. It is well settled that the road to  any recovery begins with an acknowledgement that a problem exists. We have  yet to hear anything of thissort from Olam. Investors really need to understand  why this problem exists, and how the Company proposes to fix it. Lacking this  transparency, investors have no basis to form opinions as to whether the Company  is likely to improve its performance. |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
02-Sep-2013 07:16 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Seriously...this time really tua ho tua pai liao | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
02-Sep-2013 07:03 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Pending release of material announcement | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 21:27 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Glaucus should be looking through the Response at the moment. Sunday burnt liao... | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 21:00 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
CMZ's Response looks very strong. Now must watch out for Glaucus's counter, if any. | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 19:35 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Tomorrow may have chance to make some fast trades for the risk-takers bah!!??!!
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 19:20 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Tonight i'm going to burn midnight oil!!!
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 19:08 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
CMZ's Response is out!!! Tomorrow trading halt will be lifted!!! | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 18:06 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 1 |
If really no Response by 2359 and go for suspension, will be another blow to shareholders because CMZ promised by end of this week!!!
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 17:53 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
I think views and action plans are not the priority at this stage now. Facts and proofs of evidence of innocence are what investors are waiting for from CMZ.
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 17:02 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
I guess CMZ may have to check every subsidaries and accounts thoroughly...cannot afford to suffer another attack anymore after market value wiped out half. If they are not 100% accurate in their Response and lift the halt, investors' money are at risk if Glaucus has somemore evidence to release to catch CMZ by surprise. | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 16:25 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Glaucus may not have played its last cards.. | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 16:08 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Are they really sure everything on their side is swee swee when they rebuke the allegations? How come Response can take so long still don't want to release??? | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 15:57 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Making investors wait so long for the Response??? | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 14:21 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Must study CMZ's Response and wait and see whether Glaucus counter respond again. Let them fight it out first until dust settles.
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 13:47 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Sgx website up..still no release?? | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 08:18 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
Sgx website closed for maintenance. | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
01-Sep-2013 00:36 | China Minzhong / China Minzhong Food forum Go to Message | ||||
x 0
x 0 |
2359... | ||||
Good Post Bad Post |
First < Newer   1401-1420 of 4497 Older> Last |